President Obama evidently wants all future elections to be determined by votes cast by those legally ineligible to vote. ACORN may very well have put Obama into office, given the millions of fraudulent votes tallied in 08' but Obama's assault upon Arizona and suddenly pushing immigration reform clearly indicates he is uneasy relying upon felons, the long dead, and Mexican nationals to remain in office. I am surprised Obama has not abandoned the phrase "path to citizenship" for a more apt tag line: a path to the voting booth. While Obama could not care less as to the plight of felons, he is at least supporting, if not directing, efforts to give voting rights to convicted felons. President Obama seems to grasp the importance of legally solidifying his voter base rather than depending upon ACORN, unions, and the media facilitating his 'LAWS DON'T MATTER, VOTE! DRIVE'. Personally, I would love to be fly on the wall during one of his White House War Room brainstorming strategy meetings on how to achieve the ultimate social justice and bring dead people out from the shameful, dehumanizing shadow of their coffins and into the light of the Democratic party where they belong.
President Obama wasted no time in ordering Eric Holder to file suit against the Arizona immigration bill which is merely a re-statement of federal statute. Amazingly, Obama takes the position that if his administration chooses not to enforce federal law, no state then has the right to do so. This is a completely absurd posture for Obama to hold and demonstrates an unthinkably immense legal ignorance as to consequences if his position becomes precedent. If the Arizona law is struck down, prisons could very easily be forced to release everyone, not because of overcrowding but on grounds that every drug dealer, murderer, rapist, and pervert was falsely imprisoned. I understand that the left would view my contention as extreme and fall back on their favorite line: "that could never happen in America". This is of course the epitome of hypocrisy given liberals' intention to obliterate our Founding Father's dream and that no leftist has ever been able to supply me a single instance where leftist legislation has not been perverted beyond that which conservatives feared would be the ultimate consequence of said legislation.
As I have said repeatedly, my fear and concerns for our nation are not because of Obama specifically, but rather that so many people supported him in the first place, and still support him. Sure, the latest Rasmussen pole states Obama's job approval is down to 44%, and though that is less than half the nation, it hardly represents a small number. Personally, I have always felt a healthy society can weather the moronic efforts of the terrifyingly ignorant, provided their numbers do not enter the realm of the statistically significant but I don't believe any culture can withstand the influence of over a hundred million imbeciles. Quite frankly, I think it foretells doom for this once great nation that there even exits a debate over the Arizona law, much less a presidential effort to thwart it.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
IS SLAVERY BY FORCE WORSE THAN SLAVERY BY CHOICE?
With the latest flurry of racially motivated actions gushing from the White House, the left has once again proven the concept of right and wrong is something never taken into consideration when pressing their Republic destroying agenda and the Ms. Sherrod case is no exception. Everyone from the NAACP to the White House is claiming to be a victim regarding the Ms. Sherrod affair. Of course according to them, the true villain is FOX NEWS and I don't view myself as the world's preeminent psychic in having predicted who they would blame for the whole misunderstanding. With the whole speech given to the NAACP gathering now released, which logic dictates the NAACP had all the time, Ms. Sherrod is being called a woman of true integrity. This merely for imparting an anecdote where she clearly engaged in racist behavior in the performance of her duties as a taxpayer funded civil servant, and supposedly experienced a racial epiphany. I must admit to being slightly curious as to how many times whites failed to obtain equal assistance from her before and after she had her self-proclaimed racial awakening, however, I am more intrigued by the lefts' omnipresent willingness to forgive one of their own for racism and how Ms. Sherrod hardly took a breath before claiming FOX NEWS is singularly dedicated to bringing the nation back to a fully segregated structure. I am not surprised at Ms. Sherrod's comments, even in the face of FOX NEWS being the only organization not unanimously calling for her head and Glen Beck being the only person that defended her before anyone else joined in. What does surprise me is that President Obama would so swiftly discard Ms. Sherrod when she clearly is such a good fit in his phenomenally racist administration. The only parallel for Obama's behavior I can find are the actions of dictators around the world, past and present.
I find it light years beyond repugnant that so many American citizens have no problem accepting the liberal tenet that current and historical racism from a liberal should be summarily forgiven or better yet, ignored, while Democrats universally maintain that being a conservative automatically makes you a racist and once a conservative racist, always a conservative racist. This vile permanent posture of the left is far worse than the child that falsely accuses someone of sexual abuse, for in theory, a child by definition may still have the chance to ultimately learn right from wrong, and the false claims of a child usually only destroys a single family rather than threatens an entire nation.
I do not list Ms. Sherrod as a victim in this matter except that she is a member of the black race, and the true victim in this matter is the whole of the United States, especially members of the black race. Admittedly, an argument can be made that the American tax payer is the singular victim, who has been paying the salary of Ms. Sherrod, an admitted racist, for over 24 years and now must either pay the tab for Ms. Sherrod's new, more expensive job or pay off the law suits which certainly untold thousands of lawyers have already urged her to file, but all blacks are the true victims. As horrible as it must have been to be rounded up, chained, herded into ships, sold in markets like cattle, and to have their very survival dependent upon the whims of their white masters, this slavery was temporary in the United States and the ideological enslavement the majority of blacks have chosen is potentially permanent. Our countries' Constitution was the sole mechanism that enabled this country to abolish slavery in its original form, but if the left is successful in their efforts to bastardize and relegate America's deed to freedom to an anachronistic junk pile, there will be no tool remaining to forestall the whole country becoming a nation of slaves.
Since it can be logically argued that every word ever written is agenda driven, I can not swear to God that I am not, in some fashion, motivated by a prejudicial desire to see modern ideological slaves rise up and assume roles that whites in the 19th century took to secure their freedom, but I can swear with complete assurance without fear of Divine retribution that I could never be ironically pleasured by a people once freed returning to slavery by their own choosing. I can honestly say that my feelings would remain the same even if it did not mean I, too, were to become a slave as well.
It may be presumptuous of me to contend that slavery by choice is worse than slavery by force, but I don't see my posture changing anytime soon since there is no one still alive today that can credibly argue the reverse.
I find it light years beyond repugnant that so many American citizens have no problem accepting the liberal tenet that current and historical racism from a liberal should be summarily forgiven or better yet, ignored, while Democrats universally maintain that being a conservative automatically makes you a racist and once a conservative racist, always a conservative racist. This vile permanent posture of the left is far worse than the child that falsely accuses someone of sexual abuse, for in theory, a child by definition may still have the chance to ultimately learn right from wrong, and the false claims of a child usually only destroys a single family rather than threatens an entire nation.
I do not list Ms. Sherrod as a victim in this matter except that she is a member of the black race, and the true victim in this matter is the whole of the United States, especially members of the black race. Admittedly, an argument can be made that the American tax payer is the singular victim, who has been paying the salary of Ms. Sherrod, an admitted racist, for over 24 years and now must either pay the tab for Ms. Sherrod's new, more expensive job or pay off the law suits which certainly untold thousands of lawyers have already urged her to file, but all blacks are the true victims. As horrible as it must have been to be rounded up, chained, herded into ships, sold in markets like cattle, and to have their very survival dependent upon the whims of their white masters, this slavery was temporary in the United States and the ideological enslavement the majority of blacks have chosen is potentially permanent. Our countries' Constitution was the sole mechanism that enabled this country to abolish slavery in its original form, but if the left is successful in their efforts to bastardize and relegate America's deed to freedom to an anachronistic junk pile, there will be no tool remaining to forestall the whole country becoming a nation of slaves.
Since it can be logically argued that every word ever written is agenda driven, I can not swear to God that I am not, in some fashion, motivated by a prejudicial desire to see modern ideological slaves rise up and assume roles that whites in the 19th century took to secure their freedom, but I can swear with complete assurance without fear of Divine retribution that I could never be ironically pleasured by a people once freed returning to slavery by their own choosing. I can honestly say that my feelings would remain the same even if it did not mean I, too, were to become a slave as well.
It may be presumptuous of me to contend that slavery by choice is worse than slavery by force, but I don't see my posture changing anytime soon since there is no one still alive today that can credibly argue the reverse.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
OBAMA'S DIRECTIVE TO NASA IS TWO THOUSAND YEARS TOO LATE
President Obama's instructions to the head of NASA that his primary duty is to engage in an outreach to Muslims by way of congratulating them for their contributions to math and science is just a tiny bit belated. No one could argue that two thousand years ago, a handful of individuals from the region made some significant mathematical cognitive quantum leaps, but Obama's gushing praise is flawed in more than just tardiness. Evidently, president Obama is ignorant of the fact that the 'Muslim' worlds' mathematical prowess came nearly 700 years before the birth of Islam. Frankly, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to gather that Mohamed's brain child probably played a significant role in sentencing the Middle-East to a static existence somewhere between the Stone and Iron ages.
Thursday, July 1, 2010
ELENA KAGAN: THE NOT SO ARTFUL DODGER
Elena Kagan makes Charles Dickens's, Fagin, look like Thomas Paine. Perhaps she took a lesson from Judge Sonia Sotomayor as to the hazard of answering a direct question with a direct answer. Obviously, Kagan saw judge Sotomayor's claim that she saw the Second Amendment as a right of the individual to keep and bear arms only to reverse herself once upon the court, as a snake pit she does not intend to jump into. Kagan's simple minded evasiveness leads me to suspect she could very well make Ruth B. Ginsberg look like Sean Hannity by comparison, and leaves me to ponder one question: how many generations back does one have to go to get where being connected to Harvard meant something good?
I've lost track as to how many times nominee Kagan has used the word humility in her testimony so I don't know how many times she could already be charged with perjury. Kagan virtually has woefully unjustified arrogance erupting from every pore on her body, and I've grown nauseated by the media's repeated references to her pedestrian maneuvering as genius. So inappropriate do I find the term for Kagan's flimsy excuses not to answer questions, I am forced to place genius at the top of my list of most abused words, above awesome and karma.
When my father first told me that someone could not be an effective lawyer or journalist and also a good person, I viewed his cynicism as extreme, but now I believe it is time to jettison the artificial, baseless complexities lawyers have used to burden and bastardize the Constitution and to treat it like the simple, product of true genius that it is.
I've lost track as to how many times nominee Kagan has used the word humility in her testimony so I don't know how many times she could already be charged with perjury. Kagan virtually has woefully unjustified arrogance erupting from every pore on her body, and I've grown nauseated by the media's repeated references to her pedestrian maneuvering as genius. So inappropriate do I find the term for Kagan's flimsy excuses not to answer questions, I am forced to place genius at the top of my list of most abused words, above awesome and karma.
When my father first told me that someone could not be an effective lawyer or journalist and also a good person, I viewed his cynicism as extreme, but now I believe it is time to jettison the artificial, baseless complexities lawyers have used to burden and bastardize the Constitution and to treat it like the simple, product of true genius that it is.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)