GREEN THING ON WHITE HOUSE LAWN SIGNALS DEATH OF CHRISTMAS

I believe green nuts and separation of church and state loonies have true comrades in the Obamas. I'll have you know, I'm not just speculating. I have proof. Have you had a look at the White House Christmas Tree yet? It is so densely plastered with only green lights, one would never guess there was a tree underneath. It looks more like an eco-friendly ICBM nose cone than a tree of any species much less a good ole fashioned conifer. When I saw that monstrosity lit up, I instantly thought of the radiation deformed humans praying to the doomsday bomb in the Planet of the Apes sequel. I guess the Obama's are not celebrating Christmas this year but rejoicing that with the ever expanding authority of the EPA and their chuckle-headed ' just say no to energy policy', next year they will not be allowed to harvest a tree, much less have the power to light it.

OBAMA SEES MEXICAN NATIONALS AS THE FUTURE OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

President Obama evidently wants all future elections to be determined by votes cast by those legally ineligible to vote. ACORN may very well have put Obama into office, given the millions of fraudulent votes tallied in 08' but Obama's assault upon Arizona and suddenly pushing immigration reform clearly indicates he is uneasy relying upon felons, the long dead, and Mexican nationals to remain in office. I am surprised Obama has not abandoned the phrase "path to citizenship" for a more apt tag line: a path to the voting booth. While Obama could not care less as to the plight of felons, he is at least supporting, if not directing, efforts to give voting rights to convicted felons. President Obama seems to grasp the importance of legally solidifying his voter base rather than depending upon ACORN, unions, and the media facilitating his 'LAWS DON'T MATTER, VOTE! DRIVE'. Personally, I would love to be fly on the wall during one of his White House War Room brainstorming strategy meetings on how to achieve the ultimate social justice and bring dead people out from the shameful, dehumanizing shadow of their coffins and into the light of the Democratic party where they belong.

President Obama wasted no time in ordering Eric Holder to file suit against the Arizona immigration bill which is merely a re-statement of federal statute. Amazingly, Obama takes the position that if his administration chooses not to enforce federal law, no state then has the right to do so. This is a completely absurd posture for Obama to hold and demonstrates an unthinkably immense legal ignorance as to consequences if his position becomes precedent. If the Arizona law is struck down, prisons could very easily be forced to release everyone, not because of overcrowding but on grounds that every drug dealer, murderer, rapist, and pervert was falsely imprisoned. I understand that the left would view my contention as extreme and fall back on their favorite line: "that could never happen in America". This is of course the epitome of hypocrisy given liberals' intention to obliterate our Founding Father's dream and that no leftist has ever been able to supply me a single instance where leftist legislation has not been perverted beyond that which conservatives feared would be the ultimate consequence of said legislation.

As I have said repeatedly, my fear and concerns for our nation are not because of Obama specifically, but rather that so many people supported him in the first place, and still support him. Sure, the latest Rasmussen pole states Obama's job approval is down to 44%, and though that is less than half the nation, it hardly represents a small number. Personally, I have always felt a healthy society can weather the moronic efforts of the terrifyingly ignorant, provided their numbers do not enter the realm of the statistically significant but I don't believe any culture can withstand the influence of over a hundred million imbeciles. Quite frankly, I think it foretells doom for this once great nation that there even exits a debate over the Arizona law, much less a presidential effort to thwart it.

IS SLAVERY BY FORCE WORSE THAN SLAVERY BY CHOICE?

With the latest flurry of racially motivated actions gushing from the White House, the left has once again proven the concept of right and wrong is something never taken into consideration when pressing their Republic destroying agenda and the Ms. Sherrod case is no exception. Everyone from the NAACP to the White House is claiming to be a victim regarding the Ms. Sherrod affair. Of course according to them, the true villain is FOX NEWS and I don't view myself as the world's preeminent psychic in having predicted who they would blame for the whole misunderstanding. With the whole speech given to the NAACP gathering now released, which logic dictates the NAACP had all the time, Ms. Sherrod is being called a woman of true integrity. This merely for imparting an anecdote where she clearly engaged in racist behavior in the performance of her duties as a taxpayer funded civil servant, and supposedly experienced a racial epiphany. I must admit to being slightly curious as to how many times whites failed to obtain equal assistance from her before and after she had her self-proclaimed racial awakening, however, I am more intrigued by the lefts' omnipresent willingness to forgive one of their own for racism and how Ms. Sherrod hardly took a breath before claiming FOX NEWS is singularly dedicated to bringing the nation back to a fully segregated structure. I am not surprised at Ms. Sherrod's comments, even in the face of FOX NEWS being the only organization not unanimously calling for her head and Glen Beck being the only person that defended her before anyone else joined in. What does surprise me is that President Obama would so swiftly discard Ms. Sherrod when she clearly is such a good fit in his phenomenally racist administration. The only parallel for Obama's behavior I can find are the actions of dictators around the world, past and present.

I find it light years beyond repugnant that so many American citizens have no problem accepting the liberal tenet that current and historical racism from a liberal should be summarily forgiven or better yet, ignored, while Democrats universally maintain that being a conservative automatically makes you a racist and once a conservative racist, always a conservative racist. This vile permanent posture of the left is far worse than the child that falsely accuses someone of sexual abuse, for in theory, a child by definition may still have the chance to ultimately learn right from wrong, and the false claims of a child usually only destroys a single family rather than threatens an entire nation.

I do not list Ms. Sherrod as a victim in this matter except that she is a member of the black race, and the true victim in this matter is the whole of the United States, especially members of the black race. Admittedly, an argument can be made that the American tax payer is the singular victim, who has been paying the salary of Ms. Sherrod, an admitted racist, for over 24 years and now must either pay the tab for Ms. Sherrod's new, more expensive job or pay off the law suits which certainly untold thousands of lawyers have already urged her to file, but all blacks are the true victims. As horrible as it must have been to be rounded up, chained, herded into ships, sold in markets like cattle, and to have their very survival dependent upon the whims of their white masters, this slavery was temporary in the United States and the ideological enslavement the majority of blacks have chosen is potentially permanent. Our countries' Constitution was the sole mechanism that enabled this country to abolish slavery in its original form, but if the left is successful in their efforts to bastardize and relegate America's deed to freedom to an anachronistic junk pile, there will be no tool remaining to forestall the whole country becoming a nation of slaves.

Since it can be logically argued that every word ever written is agenda driven, I can not swear to God that I am not, in some fashion, motivated by a prejudicial desire to see modern ideological slaves rise up and assume roles that whites in the 19th century took to secure their freedom, but I can swear with complete assurance without fear of Divine retribution that I could never be ironically pleasured by a people once freed returning to slavery by their own choosing. I can honestly say that my feelings would remain the same even if it did not mean I, too, were to become a slave as well.

It may be presumptuous of me to contend that slavery by choice is worse than slavery by force, but I don't see my posture changing anytime soon since there is no one still alive today that can credibly argue the reverse.

OBAMA'S DIRECTIVE TO NASA IS TWO THOUSAND YEARS TOO LATE

President Obama's instructions to the head of NASA that his primary duty is to engage in an outreach to Muslims by way of congratulating them for their contributions to math and science is just a tiny bit belated. No one could argue that two thousand years ago, a handful of individuals from the region made some significant mathematical cognitive quantum leaps, but Obama's gushing praise is flawed in more than just tardiness. Evidently, president Obama is ignorant of the fact that the 'Muslim' worlds' mathematical prowess came nearly 700 years before the birth of Islam. Frankly, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to gather that Mohamed's brain child probably played a significant role in sentencing the Middle-East to a static existence somewhere between the Stone and Iron ages.

ELENA KAGAN: THE NOT SO ARTFUL DODGER

Elena Kagan makes Charles Dickens's, Fagin, look like Thomas Paine. Perhaps she took a lesson from Judge Sonia Sotomayor as to the hazard of answering a direct question with a direct answer. Obviously, Kagan saw judge Sotomayor's claim that she saw the Second Amendment as a right of the individual to keep and bear arms only to reverse herself once upon the court, as a snake pit she does not intend to jump into. Kagan's simple minded evasiveness leads me to suspect she could very well make Ruth B. Ginsberg look like Sean Hannity by comparison, and leaves me to ponder one question: how many generations back does one have to go to get where being connected to Harvard meant something good?

I've lost track as to how many times nominee Kagan has used the word humility in her testimony so I don't know how many times she could already be charged with perjury. Kagan virtually has woefully unjustified arrogance erupting from every pore on her body, and I've grown nauseated by the media's repeated references to her pedestrian maneuvering as genius. So inappropriate do I find the term for Kagan's flimsy excuses not to answer questions, I am forced to place genius at the top of my list of most abused words, above awesome and karma.

When my father first told me that someone could not be an effective lawyer or journalist and also a good person, I viewed his cynicism as extreme, but now I believe it is time to jettison the artificial, baseless complexities lawyers have used to burden and bastardize the Constitution and to treat it like the simple, product of true genius that it is.

WAKE UP AND DIE RIGHT!

*President Obama will never testify or even supply a signed deposition in Governor Blago's trial. Anything Obama would say could be demonstrated to be perjury and tantamount to grounds for impeachment.
*Don't believe any rumors about Rahm Emanuel being replaced. If he left the White House, he would loose a great deal of protection president Obama affords, and he could be more likely be compelled to testify at Blago's trial and Obama could never allow that.
*If George Bush hadn't done so many things traditionally reserved for Democrats, the country would simply be receiving it's periodic refresher course "Hazards of Liberalism', from Hillary Clinton, rather than being fitted for a coffin by Obama.
*How can Democrats call Obama's choice for a new commander in Afghanistan genius when Democrats were calling him General Betray-us so recently?
*The Constitution is a very simple document and those that wish to dismantle it understand that to undermine the intent of our Founding Fathers requires that they inject complexity into the Constitution which in fact does not exist. And this artificial complexity is proof the Supreme Court has become a political body and no longer an impartial arbiter of the Constitution. Clearly, if the Supreme Court was non-political, there would be no explanation for 5-4 decisions.
*Most people believe the immensely idiotic notion that Constitutional lawyers have actually studied the Constitution.
*Stop claiming president Obama broke his word about transparency! He is the most transparent president in history. Anyone with a brain can see right through him.

MUSINGS FOR MORONS

# WHY IS IT YOU NEVER HEAR A MAN CRY OUT, "I ALMOST FELL IN, PUT THE DAMN SEAT DOWN NEXT TIME"?
# IF MANKIND IS A GENETIC PRODUCT OF ALIEN VISITORS, HOW COULD THEY HAVE BEEN SMART ENOUGH TO GET HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
# WHAT IF EARTH GOT STUCK WITH AN EARLY ALIEN TEST FLIGHT THAT JUST HAD A PREGNANT MONKEY IN IT?
# CAN YOU BE PREJUDICED IF YOU TOOK A LONG TIME TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND?
# IF MERE THOUGHT IS PROOF OF EXISTENCE, WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE LIBERALS?
# HOW SMART OF A TEACHER CAN YOU BE IF YOU MAKE HISTORY BORING?
# SINCE OBAMA GAVE BACK THE BUST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL THAT ENGLAND GAVE US, WHY WASN'T ANYONE WORRIED HE'D GIVE BACK THE STATUE OF LIBERTY WHEN HE WENT TO FRANCE?
# IF DINOSAURS WERE SO STUPID, HOW DID THEY LAST OVER 126 MILLION YEARS LONGER THAN WE WILL?
# DOES ANYONE ELSE THINK OBAMA HAS REPLACED LADY JUSTICE WITH THE THREE MONKEYS?
# WHY DON'T WE MAKE ALL ROADS GO DOWN HILL SO WE GET BETTER GAS MILEAGE?
# WHY CAN'T WE DIVERT FLOOD WATERS TO DRIER PARTS OF THE COUNTRY?
# HAS ANYONE NOTICED THAT TEACHERS AREN'T MAKING IT ON JEOPARDY ANY MORE?
# HOW IS IT THAT PEOPLE CAN CORRECTLY IDENTIFY EVERY PYRAMID SCHEME EXCEPT THE ONE THEY ARE IN?

JOHN McCAIN: PROOF NIETZSCHE WAS WRONG

Were I a conspiracy buff, I'd claim that JFK was killed because he wanted to get out of Viet Nam, and that Nixon picked Gerald Ford as a reward for his accommodations on the Warren commission, and that John Kerry and John McCain got their shots because they willingly sold 600 brothers down the river. I actually think, that JFK and Bobby were murdered because they felt the government should be the only organized crime syndicate operating in the United States, but that would run contrary to my theme and many people do believe JFK was assassinated because of his position on Viet Nam including, Oliver Stone.

Not ever having served in our armed forces, I do not feel obliged to speak in absolutes as to what I would do in certain circumstances. However, I pondered for many years about what my feelings would be were I an abandoned POW in Viet Nam. The results of my imaginary voyages ranged from wanting to live just long enough to know that my captors were being blown up along with myself, to thinking it was probably for the best that I never make it back to the United States alive. The first, I feel is pretty much self-explanatory: if rescue is not possible, I at least would want to see the torturous, despicable, sadistic devils meet their ends by the hands of the U.S. military. The other conclusion of my vicarious travels might be slightly less obvious but logical: were I to manage to, by my own resources, make it back to the United States, I would most likely be so all-consumed with hatred and contempt that my resulting violent actions would be easily dismissed as self-serving by those who made the decision that 600 some-odd American soldier's lives were a small price to pay for being able to relegate Viet Nam to history. I do not know how many Viet Nam vets reportedly went berserk and were labeled by politicians as just not being able to psychologically handle their transition, when in truth they were trying to shed light on the fact that so many of their brothers were left behind, but I know I would not wish to be one of them.

With respect to what I am about to say about a heroic American solider, I can not over stress the fact that there are situations I have not been in, for example, an acquaintance of mine once told me of being forced to watch a brother solider dig his own grave in a prison camp in Laos(?) and my knee-jerk reaction was to say, "if you are going to shoot me, dig it yourself". My acquittance could have told me then and there I was full of shit and be done with me, but he calmly and very cordially explained that if you are digging, you are still alive, and though the old adage that where there is life there is hope might not have truly applied, when you are that close to death, you covet whatever time you have.

Unlike the POW's that were truly left behind, John McCain and nearly 600 American soldiers
that were released, were not abandoned or forgotten. (at least not until they got home) They might very well have been viewed by LBJ, Nixon, and the U.S. State Department more as nuisances than brave American soldiers, but at least they still existed in the eyes of our government. Granted, POW's were evidently told daily, by their captors, that they had been forgotten by America but as long as new prisoners came in, that ploy should of had very limited success. I would like to note how uplifting I have always found the ingenious methods of communication devised by prisoners when they were facing death if caught talking to each other.

I can only guess as to the horrors John McCain and every other American that was forced to survive on the hospitality of the North Vietnamese and I make no claims that I would have fared better than any of them, but I don't believe anyone can accurately say that Senator McCain emerged the stronger for it. Senator McCain has long been known as someone willing to work with the opposition(a fact he has frequently parlayed into political success) and the only truly knock-down-drag-out political fights he has had has been with members of his own party. One hardly needs a degree in psychology to see this as a direct result of his North Vietnamese tormentors. Clearly, were he to buck them it would mean additional pain and suffering while conflicts with friends will never result in the agony which followed defiance to one's enemies.

While I have long considered John McCain to have returned from Viet Nam broken, information is coming to light, if true, sheds a much darker light upon John McCain. Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Sydney Schanberg now claims, reported by Alexander Cockburn in a recent article published in the Las Vegas Review Journal, that John McCain not only made numerous broadcasts denouncing the United States, which Schanberg claims were used to break the spirits of other POW's, but he and John Kerry, acting as investigative committee principals, covered up the existence of around 600 POW's that were abandoned to face certain death in Viet Nam. Schanberg also notes that John McCain was particularly vicious in his mocking of the families that kept insisting that their loved ones had been left behind.

With regards to Mr. Schanberg's first claim, I must check my criticism for obvious reasons. No one can know for sure what their reaction to torture will be until they have experienced the exact same degree of pain, and no can know that they could have withstood more until that is precisely what they have done. These simple, inescapable truths properly preclude me from judging Mr. McCain harshly regardless of the suffering those broadcasts may have compounded. However, the accusations of having covered up the existence of additional POW's still imprisoned in Viet Nam and cruelly mocking those wanting only the return of their loved ones, after he was physically free from his captors, is quite another matter.

Undoubtedly there will be those who believe I have no business, much less right, to question Senator McCain's strength of conviction, and perhaps to an extent they are right, but John McCain being in the front lines ridiculing those wanting only the return of their loved ones, and claiming no one was left behind is something I haven't the power or desire to excuse. If John McCain wanted nothing to do with the situation and chose non-involvement over championing the cause of the forgotten, I would find myself powerless to ethically judge the man, but he did not choose inaction. God forbid I ever face anything resembling that which John McCain was force to endure, and I prayed nightly for every soldier, during and after the Viet Nam war, but John McCain will have to look for forgiveness from the families of those forgotten warriors for having done the vile bidding of people unworthy to lick his boots.

John McCain could be one of the finest human beings that has served our country in the last seventy years, but I also wish he had somehow found the strength not to have buckled to those that felt the lives of 600 of America's finest were not worth the trouble of landing a single decisive blow upon the face of evil. As for those abandoned soldiers, who most certainly died alone after serving so courageously and selflessly, I find myself inexplicably drawn to conclude that their spirits are rooting for America to endure and that they long ago forgave John McCain. I still feel that John McCain's political career definitely should have ended before his presidential runs and probably should have ended before it began. For those that feel I've given John Kerry a free pass, it's simply because I never have, nor ever would expect better from the likes of him.

LOOK OUT MEXICO: MUSLIMS ARE IN YOUR CHICKEN COOP

Muslims are immigrating en masse to every European nation and out breeding the natives by a factor of three, and it is estimated that in less than thirty years, all of Europe will be dominated by Muslims. In the United States there were 100,000 Muslims in 1970, and today there are over 9,000,000. I know all too well that the American public is bombarded daily that the maniacal, vicious, suicide murderers comprise only a small percentage of the Muslim population, but even if that is true, the supposed peace loving variety have proven they will never stand in defiance of the terrorists, and they will do nothing to keep the maniacs from seizing power. And most importantly, anywhere and anytime Muslim fascists have obtained control, the gerbil-like peaceful majority does anything the chuckle-headed fanatics tell them to.

Being somewhat of an isolationist, my concerns about Europe are measured, but the United States is a different story. Anglo-American birthrates are at best half what is needed for replacement of the population, and African-American birthrates have dropped. Alarmingly, the only two groups that are breeding prolifically in the United States are Hispanics (illegals included) and Muslims. While some may find it pleasantly ironic that illegal Mexicans might be the only thing between the United States and Muslim domination, I have my doubts. If Mexicans had only the slightest track record of standing up to tyranny in their own country rather than running to the United States only to spread crime and poverty here, I perhaps would find myself capable of acknowledging the possibility of a silver lining surrounding the Mexican invasion of the United States. The fact is, Mexicans have proven themselves no better at standing up to evil than has the so called peace loving Muslims and no matter how violent and bloodthirsty many Mexican gang members may be, Muslims will find them no more troubling than a few gnats, and they will kill them or relegate them to peon status faster than you can say "La Cucaracha".

I do not find the death of the United States the least bit humorous. The Latino reclamation of the American Southwest, will no doubt be short lived, thanks to Muslims, but Mexican nationals probably sharing our fate is no consolation given the death of America will precede it. What I find disgustingly ironic is that predominantly Caucasian leftists of this country have paved the way for Muslim domination with their nauseatingly warm and fuzzy politically correctness in response to the Mexican invasion of the United States. Admittedly, no one can know the precise time frame of the above scenario, but given America's current path, without rational intervention, it is simply a matter of time. If there is anything pitifully funny in all this, it is what will happen to the 'separation of church and state' battle cry of ACLU types, in the wake of Islamic domination.

THE HOME GROWN TERRORISM LIE

What has happened to the good ole' Red, White and Blue? According to president Obama, Secretary Napalitano, indeed the entire White House staff, which includes MSNBC, red blooded American youths are going rouge, and choosing to become terrorists. At least, that's what the White House would have us believe. If you listened to Secretary Napalitano, you would have to conclude that the task of identifying and tracking down Islamic terrorists has gotten a whole lot more difficult these days. Evidently, those sympathizing with Muslim lunatics, feeling America is responsible for all acts of terror and wanting to fight for Allah, are now coming from all walks of life. President Obama would have us believe that next would be terrorist could pop out from under any rock, no one is beyond suspicion, invulnerable to persuasion, or incapable of opening their eyes and seeing how evil the United States has been. And of course, we should all be thankful to him going around and apologizing to our enemies for making them hate us so. Clearly, all true blue Americans should be relieved that president Obama has finally decided to take the bull by the horns and use tax dollars wisely. No doubt with this expansion of the home grown terror threat, Obama will order tight monitoring of all members of the Elks lodge and the Jaycees, and of course, order round-the-clock surveillance of all Nascar fans, Eagle Scouts, and the biggest threat of all: 32nd Degree Masons. Don't forget, George Washington was a Mason, and look what he did to our country.

I wonder, could a bunch of good-ole-boys actually be joining the ranks of Muslim extremists? If that's the case, why are they all named Hasan, Abdul, or Ahmad? Are we really expected to believe that Elmer and his brothers, Darell and Darell changed their names in hopes of remaining inconspicuous? Simply stated, there is no such thing as home grown Islamic terrorism in this country, for I refuse to call the violent acts committed by Muslims and their spawn, that never should have been granted citizenship in the first place, home grown. However, in the spirit of open mindedness, I will reexamine my assessment of home grown Islamic terrorism when it is proven to me that just one, dyed in the wool, genuine 'Billy Bob' has traded in his Stars and Stripes and Stars and Bars for a Star and Crescent.

OLAF'S OBSERVATIONS CONTINUED

# IF THERE IS NO GOD, WE ARE DOING OKAY, IF THERE IS A GOD, WE BETTER FIND THAT DAMN SNOWBALL.
# JUSTICE IS WON, NOT DISPENSED.
# IN WAR, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS INNOCENT CIVILIANS.
# WISDOM WILL PERHAPS FOLLOW KNOWLEDGE, BUT IT PRECEDES COMMON SENSE.
# SATAN ALREADY KNOWS YOUR WEAKNESSES SO HE CONCENTRATES ON WHAT YOU THINK ARE YOUR STRENGTHS.
# POWER MAY CORRUPT, BUT IT NEVER ONCE STARTED THE PROCESS.
# PITY THOSE THAT DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO DO RIGHT FOR RIGHT'S SAKE.
# IF YOU HAVE TO DEFEND LIBERTY, YOU HAVE FAILED TO CHAMPION IT.
# IF WHAT YOU OFFER AS SUPPOSITION IS MORE FIRMLY ROOTED IN TRUTH AND FACT, THAN WHAT YOUR OPPONENT OFFERS AS ABSOLUTE, YOU WILL ALWAYS WIN THE DEBATE.
# PROPAGANDA ONLY NEEDS IGNORANCE TO SUCCEED.
# TRUST A STUPID PERSON THAT SEEKS CHALLENGES OVER A SMART ONE THAT AVOIDS THEM.

THOSE WAR-MONGERING JEWS ARE AT IT AGAIN

The president of Iran has repeatedly made it clear that his nuclear ambitions are for peaceful purposes only and since there has been nothing in the main stream media that would lead me doubt the word of the Iranian president, he must be telling the truth. Heck, he spoke at one of our most prestigious universities: Columbia. Granted there has been reports, (largely from right-wing nut networks like Fox News) that the Iranian president has said he wants to wipe Israel off the map, however, were that true President Obama would undoubtedly have condemned Iran and made it clear that until they cease all hostilities to Israel, Iran will be treated like a plague ship by the civilized world. But since Iran still enjoys fair standing in the world and growing popularity among those of the Obama administration, especially following the Israeli brutal murder of nine humanitarians who wanted only to bring modern plumbing to Gaza. (as evidenced by the pipes they were wielding) it is obvious that Israel is a brutal, imperialistic, racists, country that must be monitored closely to prevent them from gaining access to nuclear weapons, for as soon as they obtained them, they most certainly will turn the rest of the Middle-East into a parking lot.

I am shocked beyond words at the sight of those brutal, Nazi-like Israeli commandos repelling down to the deck of a ship on a rescue mission armed with perhaps the most diabolical weapon devised by man since mustard gas: paintball guns. To those that are not familiar with this most sinister of weapons, epitomizing man's inhumanity to man, they are well documented to be responsible for thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of unsightly bruises! I guess the world community should breath a sigh of relief that the Israeli pirates did not board the relief ship armed with potato cannons or the members of the Islamic Peace Corps could never have beaten the Israeli criminals to a pulp with their pipes, thus the ensuing blood bath would have been far worse.

Clearly, Israeli efforts to obtain harmony with their peace loving neighbors has been hollow at best. At least seven times Israel has supposedly offered land for peace, while in truth, they were simply luring their enemies closer so when peace loving Muslims merely killed a few Jews, Jews could move in and kill disciples of Islam more easily. While this repugnant tactic alone should be enough to condemn all Jews, Israel seems to taking yet another step towards the war they want so intently. According to reports within Israel, Israeli diplomats are claiming they will no longer offer land for peace. This vile snubbing of the peace process would be laughable were it not so tragic, since theoretical quantum physicists are now claiming that if you walk into a brick wall enough times,(a number approaching infinity) the mystifying realm of quantum physics will allow you to eventually pass through without impacting a single atom of the wall. Clearly, this alone reveals the transparent hypocrisy of Jews claiming 'land for peace' is a diplomatic dead end.

While I believe I have made my case to consider Israel the scourge of planet Earth, I have just learned from sources deep within Israel, that Israel has had nuclear weapons for over fifty years but since the Islamic collective is thriving as never before, I can only assume that a handful of decent, peace loving Jews have split off from their blood thirsty countrymen and managed to keep them hidden all these years from the Israeli military. It is my every hope that president Obama will find a way to reach out to that small group of responsible Jews, hiding the nuclear weapons, and personally offer to transport them to Iran for safekeeping. I know I will sleep better when the threat of those war-mongering Jews having nuclear weapons is eliminated.

OBAMA GETS HELP FROM MORE ACCOMPLISHED LIAR

Don't look now, but whatever political leverage Bill Clinton had yesterday, it just got a Mega-dose of HGH. Arguably the most skilled liar in American political history has just bailed out President Obama and I trust, in good ole' Chicago tradition, he was well paid. I don't know if Obama and his lawyers, otherwise known as the Justice Department, have decriminalized their offer to Sestak by getting Bill Clinton to claim he made the offer, at the request of Rhom Emanuel, they have at least added a layer of insulation to Obama's coat of many colors. Mr. Clinton, who we all remember as the man who taught Websters a thing or two about the word is, has moved up two additional syllables, more specifically, to the word, bri-ber-y.

As much as I would like to have Washington, D.C., filled with intelligent, decent honorable men and women, times like these make me thankful that politicians themselves have not escaped the effects of their war on education. I shudder to think how much worse off we would be if politicians were not significantly more stupid than the public in general. Admittedly, thanks to the one time guardians of truth, now the Obama information bureau,(aka the media) most Obama supporters will not even hear of this latest example of the Obama administration's pathological lying, nor would they care even if they did, but those in possession of a hand-full of brain cells see this latest spewing from the White House for the steer manure that it is. While I am aware that three or four politicians, with the aide of intense tutoring, could in fact pass a second grade curriculum, I am equally confident that the collective brain power and political know-how of the Obama administration is inferior to that of the cast of "Spin City".

Given the similarities to Spin City and the Obama administration, I still find it difficult to believe that anyone could sell a sit-com to network executives entitled "Al Capone goes to Washington". Perhaps, however, a successful drama depicting the Obama presidency is not that far-fetched, after all, the "Sopranos" was highly rated. I guess the only real obstacle to a program that accurately depicted the Obama presidency would be the total absence of a character with any likable or endearing qualities.

I am not without sympathy for Obama and his gang, however, for it must be unimaginably stressful and frustrating to always have to keep coming up with feeble-minded fabrications to explain their unintentionally transparent Chicago style of governing. I suspect the entirety of the Obama administration goes to bed nightly and dreams of the day that they can once again utilize Al's favorite and most frequently utilized solution to any problem. I wonder at times, if Obama, just to keep morale high, reminds his lieutenants and assorted wiseguys that once his fundamental transformation of America is complete, they will not have to continuously compose fairy-tails, or leave their problems above ground.

There is one group of people in this country I do not have any sympathy for however, those that have swallowed the bat guano from the Obama administration and the media from day one. And only one thing prevents me from asking all of them to think again: the required presupposition that they have something to think with.

AFTER ALL, ITS JUST A BEAUTY CONTEST

I don't watch beauty contests in general, only catching brief moments as I run through channels. After all, I am a man with a remote. However, I have long found the politics surrounding them intriguing. Undoubtedly, last nights victor was not unattractive but as is customary, she was anything but well spoken. She indeed may have been fair in appearance but she failed miserably in understanding questions, much less, fielding them. I find such contests reminiscent of Olympic judging in boxing and figure skating. For decades, American boxers would pummel their skanky Cuban counterparts but judging always favored the little middle-aged amateurs, and no matter how many times she fell on her ass, the veteran Russian figure skater always eked out a win over the young American upstart that skated a perfect routine. While subjectivity is impossible to completely eliminate, I would like to know where it is written that gays and lesbians are the best judge of female beauty. Just once, I'd like to see a beauty contest judged by a panel made up entirely of heterosexual males. Granted, finding that many heterosexual males in today's entertainment industry may be a daunting task, but if such a panel were compiled, I'm confident that political agendas would not enter their minds as they ogled the contestants. The only obstacle then to an impartial assessment of each contestant would be the result of drool marks obscuring judge's score cards.

Last year it was gay marriage, even though a contestant expressed an identical opinion to President Obama's, she was crucified and came in second, and this year, the would be winner expressed support for Arizona trying to battle extinction itself. Bias has become so blatant that the transparent cow towing to the middle east, given the winner was a Lebanese Muslim is minor by comparison. Is it not enough that we now have a president that holds the great heritage of this country in contempt, identifies solely with our enemies, and has surrounded himself with like minded individuals? Must we be constantly reminded that our country is dying even when we are just seeking a moment or two of light, relaxing entertainment?

One would be hard pressed to find any law that does not have the potential for abuse and any law that already has not been abused in some fashion, but this does not mean we should wipe all statutes off the books. It is quite clear that progressives wish to hog-tie any examples or efforts at capitalism but want to deregulate and/or decriminalize late term abortions, breaking into this country, rape, (unless the accused perpetrator is a young, white, privileged class, lacrosse player) , racism and discrimination(against whites), and of course any form of bestiality, including tying yourself to a hog.

After all, its just a beauty contest. And if a contestant that has not just returned from a tour of duty with the Peace Corps, or that doesn't whine for world peace, or doesn't sound like a disciple of Rodney King's gets judge's butt floss in a twist, then simply tell every contestant what to say. Or better yet, dispel with all hypocrisy by lobotomizing all contestants, removing their larynx's, and mandate that all talent programs involve a brass pole.

ARIZONANS UNWILLING TO GO THE PATH OF THE NOBLE RED MAN

Hollywood has long promoted the image of the noble American Indian; however, residents of Arizona, in an act of unimaginable courage and defiance, have said to the Federal authorities, that they will not take another step on their own "trail of tears". Many historians have said if American Indians had only a unifying figure, their own Genghis Khan, if you will, the 'White Horde' could have been turned back. But native Americans were broken into tribal groups who often warred against each other and never possessed sufficient communications between the tribes, or produced that one leader that could focus all American Indians against their greatest threat. And, clearly, the Great White Chief, in Washington, wants to prevent any unification of Americans against the Horde invading our country today. I must admit to surprise that citizens of Arizona beat Texans to the realization that the Federal Government has broken the treaty with Americans but, hopefully, Texas and other states will soon follow.

Quite predictably, Obama is spreading as much rhetorical manure over Arizona as possible, and, given the composition of his administration, Obama's supply of crap is potentially infinite. Obama's goals are simple and transparent: portray citizens of Arizona as bigoted, racist white trash and fertilize the crop of American hating, soon to be legal liberal voters, swarming in from our southern border so he can better cultivate his transformation of America. Personally, I've grown nauseated by the grotesquely feeble contentions from those who would destroy this nation: "We are a nation of immigrants," and "They do the jobs Americans refuse to." To the first mischaracterization, America was once a vast unsettled wilderness and people came to become part of the American dream, not to invade and reclaim the country for England, France or Spain. Or, to come to this country to rape its prosperity in hopes of changing America into that which they fled. The second leftist regurgitation is obscene and false. Virtually every time the government has thrown a bone to the public by deporting a businesses workforce en mass, American citizens have lined up in force for the jobs.

Throughout the Southwest, illegals have sucked public services dry. I am confident that if just the illegal immigrant drain on hospitals, schools, and social services within states of the southwest, did not exist, budget shortfalls amounting to 900 million to 35 billion dollars would virtually disappear. But this is not something the left considers relevant.

To all those that still grieve for the noble red man having suffered genocide at the hands of White America, that historical racial cleansing is nothing compared to that which is ongoing today in America. And, if left unchecked, will amount to the largest genocidal event in recorded history as well as the death of man's greatest and most noble dream.

BANNING AMERICAN OFFSHORE DRILLING: ANTI-LOGIC AT ITS WORST

I know that decent rational people view the human fatalities as the greatest tragedy of the recent oil platform explosion, but I doubt that fact even made it on the list of the radical environmentalists now in control of U.S. energy policy. Sure they will use the loss of human life as a minor tool in their argument against further drilling, but I suspect humans dying while engaging in what they view as raping planet Earth fits perfectly with their sense of justice. And I have little doubt that many Gya-chuckle-heads would have considered an even greater human death toll as a step in the right direction to protecting Mother Earth.

I see the biggest problem with the gulf oil rig explosion is that it was a British Petroleum rig that blew up instead of a Mexican or Chinese well. While I'm confident that American interests impacted by the oil spill will recoup a small percentage of lost revenues from British Petroleum, Americans might have a better chance of waking from their cognitive coma after having been laughed at by Mexico or China and totally screwed by the World Court when claims of damages are filed. It speaks great ill for the future of this country that even a single American citizen could be so stupid as to think that U.S. interests are best served by having other countries, that could not care less about our white sand beaches, drill off our coasts, not to mention having a president that holds that belief.

OBAMA'S GOOD LUCK IS BAD LUCK FOR COUNTRY

Given Obama's powder-puff approach to terrorism, he has become the living embodiment that it is better to be lucky than good. Albeit, the Fort Hood terrorist attack could only be considered successful from a Islamic standpoint, but the Obama administration has managed to wipe the incident from public consciousness diverting blame to military paralysis. (otherwise known as federally mandated political correctness) However, the chuckle-headed Muslim that probably couldn't manage to blow up his shorts with the aide of a $10 Vegas crack whore, and the latest warrior for Allah that obviously valued his mortal existence too much to stick around personally overseeing ignition and reap the reward of seventy-two virgins in return, have amounted to manna from Allah for the Obama administration.

Though I am probably more knowledgeable in Middle-eastern psychology than any member of the Obama administration, I hardly consider myself an expert, but perhaps the promise of being smothered in virginal bliss after doing Allah's bidding has lost some of its punch as a recruiting tool. Who knows, perhaps the would be underwear bomber had too much sweat mixed with filth on his balls and ignition failed, or maybe the sophistication of the apparatus itself was beyond the young man's comprehension; after all, I'm confident that successful ignition was dependent upon his knowing how to correctly put on a pair of underwear. Perhaps if Muslims spent less time washing their feet and actually bathed the rest of their bodies from time to time their bodies might not be so flame retardant.

For what ever reason recent attempts to kill Americans have failed, I'm afraid that the fact they were not successful will prove damaging to America. Almost instantly there was praise from the White House for the great police work in preventing the Time Square bombing when the truth is we were just plain lucky. With the suspects innumerable trips to Pakistan, how he was not on a watch list I do not know. Much has been made that he is a citizen of the USA(naturalized a year ago) and deserving of due process, but with the subhuman maniacs that continue to be given free shots at American lives, my mind pleasantly drifts back to the good-ole days when wartime due process meant shot while trying to escape.

Barely three months after 9-11, I heard people calling the twin towers being brought down as "no big deal", and even one person said to me, "I don't care about it, its not like anyone I knew died". Personally, I feel every television channel should have been playing the towers collapsing nightly for the last nine years. Perhaps then, with a nightly dose of the horror of that day and the images of so many choosing to jump to their deaths rather than be burned alive, the general public would not have been so quick to forget we are at war. At any rate, recent terrorist incompetence has left many people thinking that we are just as safe as when GW was calling the shots, and nothing could be farther from the truth. But, Americans can rest assured that the Obama administration will not rest until they discover a connection between the would be, Time Square bomber and a right-wing militia group.

GLEN BECK BATTLES PROGESSIVES AND BASIC AMERICAN DENIALISM

While MSNBC and others of the OBN(Obama News Network) batter away at Glen Beck daily, I'm not sure they are aware of the ally they have in a simple, yet pronounced component of American psychology. In a world where congress enjoys its lowest trust rating since such data has been compiled, the Supreme Court is viewed by many as a group of rabid appointed legislators, and the President's approval ratings have been on a steady down slide since he took office and the few moments where the President's ratings have eased their steady descent has been when he invents a new root villain for the countries woes which could make Hitler blush, I'm afraid a large contingent of the American public still 'feel' that no single American can really be as bad and seeking ill for the country as president Obama, much less, a whole administration packed full.

While I think President Obama could be in possession of the thinnest skin of any man that has ever held the office, that alone can not explain the so remarkably unpresidential nature of the constant barrage of attacks upon Mr. Beck. The only explanation for this assault is that Mr. Beck's rhetoric not only rings of truth, he has proven to be an educator without peer. Mr. Beck has injected himself into the script of a Scifi movie where he alone has discovered that malevolent aliens have long plotted, and are finally taking the last steps to take over the country, and he alone must shock the brainwashed public out of their brain numbed trance. The only difference being that this is not a movie, and the beings trying to destroy the United States are human. At least in a biologic sense.

Mr. Beck always carefully explains that the destruction of America did not begin with Obama, but Obama is merely moving the pieces in what progressives hope is the end game of the America of our Founding Fathers. While much is made of modern literacy rates compared to the past, I contend that the ability to read without the ability to understand, and controlling what people read and hear leaves a people more susceptible to propaganda and brainwashing than a population unable to recite the alphabet. I am regularly brought to the precipice of a technicolor yawn in the face of people that believe reading Time, O, Newsweek, Cosmopolitan, and watching MSNBC legitimizes their claim of being informed. Currently, Mr. Beck is the only celebrity advocating reading materials written by our Founding Fathers, and reading that which those currently in control of this country have written.

As is my custom, when someone presents an opinion or information which concerns me, yet I fear may be accurate, my energies are directed at finding flaws in their argument and Mr. Beck's assessment of what our government has metastasized into, is no exception. I take an approach not unlike the way loan officers used to operate: Try and find a reason not to lend the money, and if you can't, it is okay to make the loan. Since, however, Mr. Beck's case, employs so much information I have long been aware of, and conclusions I have long held, my own lack of ignorance proves an obstacle to the objectivity I normally insist from myself. As much as I have tried however, I've been unable to find infractions in Mr. Beck's deductions, more over, I've been unable to unearth any element of Mr. Beck's arguments that would logically lead anyone to any other conclusions than the ones he has expressed.

The only area I stray from in Mr. Beck's gatherings is his omnipresent optimism. Sadly, I no longer am in possession of a positive outlook for our country and though I feel Mr. Beck's efforts to educate a historically deprived public is the best action taken by anyone hoping to restore America, I fear it is too little too late. I am afraid "THEY FAILED TO SEE THE EVIL BEFORE THEM" will be America's epitaph.

UPSET? OBAMA TOLD YOU EVERYTHING HE WAS GOING TO DO!

If you did not vote for Obama and you are displeased with him, you might not be an idiot. If you voted for Obama and you are happy, I hope you are just a moron. If you did not vote for Obama and you are happy with what he has done, you are probably an illegal alien that did not get to polls on time. However, if you voted for Obama and you are upset, you are definitely an imbecile. Everyone that voted for Obama deserves every bit of hell that will befall them and more, but tragically, the rest of the country must suffer along with them. The only remaining question to be answered, is whether the United States has been sentenced to purgatory for a finite period or if we have been sent to hell for all eternity.

OBAMA UNWILLING TO HEED ANCIENT CHINESE SAYING

Despite there being so many people on Obama's team that seem to be more fond of China than the United States, I was not surprised that President Obama chose to ignore the wise counsel of Confucius. Once again, Obama and the impatience of the left will, hopefully, prove their undoing. President Obama's summation at the Health Care Summit made it clear that leftists have been waiting over fifty years to jump on the European health care monstrosity, or perhaps more aptly termed, a "Logan's Run" style of health care, and government control of health care was an 'all or nothing' proposition in his eyes. Admittedly, President Obama provided patronizing and insulting lip service to Republican comments, invariably saying, "that's a legitimate point of discussion", but always I heard the unspoken coming from his tone: 'screw you, I was elected King . . . er-ah . . . president'. Please do not conclude I am complaining, for I believe if the committed left adhered to the proverb that 'even a journey of a thousand miles, begins with a single step', and did not always assume a posture of an arrogant bully every time political winds grant them the power, we would probably be already speaking an ebonic-like bastardized melding of German, Russian, and Chinese.

I have little doubt that Obama sees himself as the consummate benevolent monarch attempting to do what is best for his illiterate subjects, but his personality and style of governing are more in line with Jack, from the "Lord of the Flies". I do see, however, one good thing coming from this attempt at an Obamacare infomercial, though congressional members largely held their venom in check, President Obama put his inflexibility and entrenched ideology on full display and, while I believe public opinions might have been intensified, I suspect, none were changed.

LOONY LIBERALS DRAW UP COMMITMENT PAPERS ON TEA PARTY AND CONSERVATIVES

Mentioning the Founding Fathers infuriates Democrats more than quoting the Hippocratic Oath terrifies doctors. While the English language is arguably the most expressive language in the world, the lefts' assault upon the tea party protesters spotlights the English language's lone delinquency: there is no word for justifiable paranoia. According to the Democrats, the Tea Party is made up entirely of racist white elderly rednecks, that are too stupid to be allowed to breath, much less, have or voice opinions. In fact, the liberal media never misses an opportunity to berate Fox News for giving the Tea Party any airtime at all and accuses them of being the driving force behind the movement. If these tactics sound familiar, please note that our Founding Fathers have been demonized, called racists, and are depicted in school text books as wealthy, self-serving, narcissists who duped the colonists into doing their bidding, rather than truthfully presenting them as noble and brave men who risked their lives to birth a nation founded on personal liberty.

Virtually every liberal is committed to dismantling our Constitution, and while conservatives are disillusioned they are not delusional. To a liberal, the Bill of Right does not comprise a list of rights given to all, (as our Founding Fathers insisted) but are privileges only to be afforded to those in utter lock step with leftist ideology. According to a liberal, Freedom of Speech is only to be granted to the New York Times, MSNBC, Air America, and their allies in the war against free thought and personal freedoms. The fact that so many politicians are actively working towards the total elimination of dissenting voices to their agenda of obliterating the Constitution doesn't scare me nearly as much as the fact so many of the public have been brain-washed to think it is a good thing. Public schools stopped teaching over thirty years ago that the silencing of opposing thought is essential for the proliferation and maintenance of oppressive government and manifestly leads to a complete loss of personal freedom. Recent polls have indicated that over 25% of the American public prefers a socialistic form of government to that which was formulated by our Founding Fathers, and a nearly equal percentage of respondents were unable to decide which they preferred. Tragically, I too, must be falling prey to indecision, for I'm finding it very difficult to decide which group I find more evil and threatening to our nation: the committed commiealists or those who are so stupid, uninformed, and casual about the survival of our Nation that they are without an opinion.

I see it as no accident that the memo detailing the greatest terrorist threat to our nation to be from the right wing was released just ahead of the Tax Day Protests. Since President Obama's crowd cannot defend their positions in the arena of honest debate, they wanted to label all the protesters not only as right-wing nuts, but dangerous right-wing extremists. What if those that believe that FEMA'S ineptness during Katrina was because the organization is not structured to assist with natural disasters but to round up dissidents and make them disappear are correct? Were this to be the case, the possible flood of Obama sanctioned habeas corpus violations would make the fabricated examples at Guantanamo Bay look like a tea party.

The Tea Party and true conservatives look at the Constitution as a written declaration of the undying spirit of a free people; however, liberals call the Constitution a living document so they can disfigure it or murder it outright. Though our Founding Fathers attempted to immunize the Constitution from deadly infections and poisons, I fear President Obama and his Congressional gang of pushers has finally managed to inject the Constitution with a lethal overdose of anachronism and are intentionally squandering money so that none remains to purchase anti-toxin.

OLAF'S OBSERVATIONS

# REPUBLICANS WANT TO TURN STUPIDITY AND IGNORANCE INTO PRIVILEGES RATHER THAN RIGHTS, AND DEMOCRATS WANT TO MAKE THEM MANDATORY.
# FIGHTING IGNORANCE IS THE ONLY UN-WINNABLE WAR WORTH WAGING.
# LIFE IS MERELY THE TIME PEOPLE HAVE TO PRACTICE SOLVING PROBLEMS.
# SUCCESS AND FAILURE IS GOD'S WAY OF REDISTRIBUTING WEALTH.
# NOTHING SAYS, 'COMFORTABLE WITH ONE'S OWN IGNORANCE', LIKE AN OLD LIBERAL.
# YOU ONLY HAVE TO EARN RESPECT IF YOU HAVE LOST IT AND WANT IT BACK.
# BOTH COURAGE AND COWARDICE ARE MARRIED TO FEAR, BUT COWARDICE HAS DISHONESTY FOR A MISTRESS.
# EDUCATION IS ANYTHING THAT BETTER ENABLES YOU TO THINK AND DO FOR YOURSELF.
# THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF A SUCCESSFUL RELATIONSHIP IS A LIKE SENSE OF RIGHT AND WRONG.
# LIFE IS LIKE AN M&M, IT WILL MELT IN YOUR HAND IF YOU HOLD IT TOO LONG.
# SCIENCE MAY MOVE FORWARD BUT IT WORKS BACKWARDS.
# IF YOU REFUSE TO RESPECT YOUR ELDERS YOU WILL BE FORCED TO RESPECT YOUR BETTERS.
# THE MAIN REASON TO STUDY HISTORY IS TO BREAK UP HINDSIGHT'S MONOPOLY ON 20/20 VISION.
# THE MOST THIN-SKINNED PEOPLE ARE THOSE THAT SAY, "YOU COULDN'T INSULT ME IF YOU TRIED".
# UNFORTUNATELY NOT ONLY IS TRUTH STRANGER THAN FICTION IT'S SIGNIFICANTLY RARER.
# IF THERE IS NO COURT THAT ADDRESSES WHEN THE LETTER OF THE LAW FAILS THE SPIRIT OF THE LAW, THERE CAN BE NO JUSTICE.
# IF YOU HAVE A CHOICE TO GIVE UP, IT IS TOO SOON TO DO SO.
# YOU LEARN TO READ AND WRITE SO YOU DO NOT SOUND STUPID, YOU STUDY MATH SO YOU DO NOT APPEAR STUPID, AND YOU STUDY HISTORY TO KEEP FROM BEING STUPID.
** I came up with this one in the first grade when I was pressured by a mean old substitute teacher to give my definition of humor, after laughing in class - HUMOR IS AN ESCAPE FROM REALITY THAT BRINGS US CLOSER TO IT.

MILLIONS TO STUDY ANT SOCIETY

Most people who devote time examining our government's budget searching for waste were perplexed upon learning that millions of tax dollars were slated to fund studies of ant society and thinly veiled studies to research the most effective ways to manipulate the opinions of the general public. I, on the other hand, could measure the duration of my surprise in a matter of nano-seconds. Given President Obama's goals and desires for America, I found his support for the study as making perfect sense. For at least forty years I've contended that communism worked fine at the insect level but it becomes evil when implemented above the level of ants and bees. With all due respect to PETA and like minded organizations, I admit to being ignorant as to whether or not, within each ant or bee colony, a population of dissidents exists whose goal is to obtain equal rights and freedom for all bugs.

Since becoming aware of the grants sponsoring the study of optimum brainwashing techniques and ant society I felt they were obviously geared on how to best structure a lasting communist society, but something did not fit. Then, it hit me like a ton of feathers. The need for these studies is not how to configure an enduring communistic superstructure for America, for that vision is already clear in the minds of Obama and his troop, but it is more a matter of how best to market their societal transformation and solving the problem of how to get rid of those annoying gadflies who still inexplicably look fondly at the likes of Thomas Jefferson. Over the course of hundreds of millions of years insects have become genetically hardwired to the drone or worker mentality, but the process of evolution, which enabled them to develop to this state has not suddenly stopped. So, I suspect what most interests Obama and his crowd is how insects purge themselves of those which exhibit mutant behaviors of individuality.

I fully acknowledge that many will view my assessment as belonging in a boxcar aboard the conspiracy rail road, but that position is only possible as a result of feeble memories and utter ignorance. I lost count years ago, as to how many times leftist legislation has been proposed and conservative opposition has been drummed out by the favorite line of the left: 'that's taking it to an extreme, that could never happen in America'. Of course, the end result of the legislation invariably and ultimately damages America more severely than its' detractors originally claimed or thought possible.

Personally, it is not that politicians treat the voting public as if they were morons that most bothers me, for clearly many are, but what truly infuriates me is that politicians are such phenomenal imbeciles themselves and to have such vile idiots look at me as if I were cognitively challenged by comparison, is what I find intolerably repugnant. And to the progressive left, simply that ant and bee societal structure has endured for hundreds of millions of years does not mean that their longevity is translatable to humans. I guess putting these thoughts to paper is my way of claiming allegiance with the handful of freedom fighting insects left in America.

DOES ANY STATE THAT BROUGHT US AL FRANKEN DESERVE TO WIN?

As a kid, I did not know the state of Minnesota was so screwed up. I was content watching Fran Tarkenton with only Bill Brown and momentum on his side, stage comeback after comeback with only a minute or two remaining, only to see Green Bay or Chicago stroll down the field in a few seconds to defeat the Vikings. Norm Van Brocklyn football was the dirtiest form found in either league, and the huge number of penalties levied was proof that everyone knew it, yet I rooted the team named after my ancestors unflinchingly.

When Bud Grant came along with Joe Kapp in tow, everything changed. The Vikings cleaned up their game, drafted well, began trouncing the traditional bullies, and became the team everyone would choose to have escort them down a dark alley in a bad neighborhood. The only drawback was that referees still treated Minnesota as a dirty team even though they had become the cleanest in football and Norm Van Brocklyn was little more than a memory. The Vikings went to four Superbowls during their heyday and should have gone to a fifth, but back then, officials never let anything get in the way of America's team(Dallas Cowboys)and the big game.

By the time the championship game with Dallas came along, I figure I was alone among Vikings fans, wanting them to go to the Superbowl and lose it again. Back then I had concluded that the world would end before another team went five times without a victory, thus firmly establishing the Vikings in history. Even with the loss to Dallas, I thought there was little chance that any team would go four times without a victory even if the world does not end in 2012(thanks alot Broncos and Bills). Basically, the Vikings viewed each of their Superbowls as just another game, much like Democrats view the Constitution as just another piece of paper. Of course, being out-coached all four games was a factor as well.

This past season was a bit different. To hell with history, go to the Superbowl and win it, I thought, but this was not to be. Clearly, untold millions more will be wagered on the Saints/Colts game than would have come in on a Vikings/Colts game even if you don't count the millions of dollars that will be wagered by those who scammed FEMA following Katrina. And no telling how many people who could no more find Louisiana on a map than stand on their heads and spit rubber nickles will be risking future lottery winnings on the Saints.

I've supplied you with all of my past feeble-minded rationalizations so you can bear witness to what I hope will be my last. While I did not condemn Minnesota for electing Jesse Ventura, a man who clearly did a good job hiding his manic tendencies during his campaign for governor, but electing Al Franken, give me a #^$*ing break! While I'm confident that Franken actually lost by three to five hundred votes(a margin that no democrat hadn't the power to defraud) the fact that Franken received more than a few thousand votes from those that regularly call Minnesota asylums home, is unimaginable. So, because of this, I contend that the State of Minnesota did not deserve to have the better team win in New Orleans.

IT IS IRRATIONAL TO GIVE OBAMA THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT

This country has arguably had great presidents, good presidents, okay presidents, lousy presidents, down right crappy presidents, and the only thing I can say for sure is that if you ask 100 different people to make a list placing our presidents in one of these five groups, you will get 110 different results. There is another category of president however, which has thankfully been without a single member throughout America's history, until now. This new category, entirely because of President Obama, is 'Would be Dictator'.

Candidate Obama, despite the cowardly rhetoric of Republicans, claiming he was merely an unknown commodity rather than a man of obvious Marxist aspirations for America, repeatedly made his vision for America clear while campaigning. Obama constantly voiced his feelings on wealth redistribution, that capitalism is fatally flawed, that government control of all aspects of life is essential for a functioning society, and that he was more than prepared to bypass all obstacles with executive orders. In the presence of all these minor clues, I was made sick to my stomach when supposed guardians of freedom, cried out in the face of Obama's attack on Joe the Plumber as if Obama had finally, for the first time, revealed his true colors.

Clearly, the campaign was not enough for a majority of American voters to see the painfully obvious, but how anyone could ignore nearly everyone Obama surrounded himself with before and after being elected president, and his approach to governing is beyond belief. Hereto I was sickened by those who claim to be watchdogs for freedom, when they only criticized Obama for such poor vetting of those he placed in his administration. Inferior vetting had nothing to do with Obama's outrageous nominations, he unquestionably knew everything about everyone he brought into his fold and was not once taken-a-back by any of their radical views because they are views he obviously shares.

The progressive elitist movement permeates both parties in this country with the Republicans behaving like the older sister constantly trying to persuade her younger brother(the Democrats) to calm down and not blow it by being too impatient. The Republicans know they have a good thing going and all will come to those who wait but they can't seem to convince the Democrats that the one thing that could screw up all their plans is to have the liberals alert the imbeciles(the general public) to the devouring of their Constitutional rights. President Obama's State of the Union Address attack upon the Supreme Court best demonstrates this impatience of the left and their pervasive need to seize immediate control. However, what I found most amusing was the theatrical outrage from Republicans. While they rightly pointed out that Obama's constitutional analysis was laughably baseless, Republican horror was largely the result of them thinking that Obama's errant rant would inspire more people to actually read the Constitution. I'm afraid that the Judge Robert Bork nomination hearings might have been the death cry for our Constitution with Democrats horrified at the prospect that someone could end up on the Supreme Court that was actually aware of the Constitutional House of Cards liberals had constructed. And, if there is any doubt to Republican complicity, think back to how incredibly inept, unenthusiastic, and hermaphroditic Republican defense of Judge Bork was during the confirmation hearing.

Today there is a cry that the Republican Party should embrace the Tea Party movement in order to halt the deformation of our Republic, but this they will never do. I therefore recommend that Americans engage in a little old fashioned usury of their own and support Republicans as long as they are actively working to politically neuter President Obama, then vote them out of office as well. For I truly fear that if Americans don't cleanse Washington D.C, we are perilously close to having elections identical to Cuba and Venezuela, where candidates win with 100% or more of the vote.

OBAMA: POSITIVE HE CAN FOOL ENOUGH PEOPLE ALL THE TIME

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. George Bush had difficulty reciting this old saying, inadvertently reversing it once (to my recollection). President Obama, on the other hand, doesn't have to keep this old saying straight in his mind because he has his own personal variation: Not only can I fool them once, I can fool them time and time again. President Obama's State of the Union Address was, in my opinion, the best speech he has ever given. It was clearly an improvement upon his campaign speeches, yet eerily packed full of the same rhetoric and promises. He promised to put a halt to earmarks and insisted that earmarks be posted on the Internet before any vote in Congress. Aside from the blatant inconsistency of this promise, Obama is counting on people to have forgotten that he claimed his stimulus bill had no earmarks, while a conservative count measured over 9,000 earmarks within the bill, and as to transparency, he promised that any health care bill would be posted on the Internet for all to see before any vote. I personally felt the liberal destruction of education was complete, but how it must have annoyed President Obama to have to promise to a re-commitment to total destruction of education since the election in Massachusetts clearly indicated that their job was not yet finished. He proposed increased tax incentives for higher education, but I fear that could easily apply only to fields approved by the Obama administration. He again promised to 'look into' clean coal, bio fuels, nuclear energy, and oil and gas production. This was identical to promises made during the campaign, and the result was no incentives, much less any lifting of barriers, making it virtually impossible for a nuclear plant to get off the drawing board, and claimed advances in bio-fuels resulted in a tripling of the cost of produce, reduction in food exports, and proving to all but the unimaginably dense that bio-fuels are environmentally unsound. And while the lip service to clean coal technology was obscene, nothing can compare to his crowing about having opened up millions of acres for oil and gas exploration early in his presidency. Not only were the vast majority of the opened lands of unknown potential, they were in areas in which extraction would cost two to three times more than areas of well established reserves.

Perhaps the most grotesque component of President Obama's spewings was an announced freeze in government spending after 2010. Obama claiming this was a commitment to fiscal responsibility would be laughable if the freeze were enacted today. Not only have most government budgets increased by nearly 20 percent in 09', Obama gives congress a whole additional year to pad budgets before the freeze. Logically, this will result in a significant increase in spending more than if there were no freeze at all.

Finally, Obama's commitment to clean up the status quo in Washington is worse than comical. Even though one could argue that JFK brought Chicago politics into the 1960 election, it took Obama to bring Chicago politics to the White House.

THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA ARMY

Because I have always held that membership in any group mandates your first obligation to be the maintenance of that groups' integrity, I feel compelled to address a smattering of conservative standard bearers and deserters from the left that God has been gracious to. After all, who would you rather hear from, Keith Olberman, a reincarnated propagandist for TASS and his trusted earwig-infested female side-kick Ms. Maddow, who doesn't even have the excuse of having been an abuser of LSD in the 60's, or a devote Conservative that firmly believes in the premise that all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, being life, liberty, and pursuit of having one of their own rip them a new one.

ANNE COULTER

Anne Coulter is definitely not a victim of the no child left behind syndrome. She doesn't feel the slightest compulsion to teach the conceptually challenged. Her attitude and I must admit to finding it refreshing, is to state realities and absolutes, and anyone that is slow to concur, doesn't have what it takes to join her ranks. Ms. Coulter does not want her army to be slowed by having to stop and nurse anyone that hesitated and thus was impaled while negotiating a conceptual fence. I'm uncertain if Ms. Coulter could be properly called the movement's General Patton, but I'm sure she qualifies as the campaign's equivalent to General Custer. Surly a lifetime could be spent debating whether Custer's overall impact was positive or negative, but no one could argue that anyone in his presence didn't know they were in the presence of a somebody, and that he had his uses. I do feel, however, that her manner permits the left to control or at least define her image to an unhealthy degree. But sadly, I'm ignorant of any solution to this that would not interfere with Ms. Coulter remaining Ms. Coulter.

BERNIE GOLDBERG

Bernie Goldberg's evolution of anger is most fascinating to observe. I find it somewhat reminiscent of my father's building fury in the face of so many incapable or unwilling, to the see the so obvious. He is on a path of public good, but his living to witness that impact may be precluded by a coronary embolism. I do find his frustration with the public's inability to grasp the leftist media's agenda slightly hypocritical since it took him so long to become aware of it himself, and if he was not slow to identify it, he is even more culpable and worthy of reproach, for having taken so long to find the courage to lend his hand in exposing that media bias he now holds in such disdain. But aside from any delays in his joining the struggle against the death of the individual, he brings a unique background, perspective, and equally unique weaponry. Consequently, a fair argument can be made that if Mr. Goldberg became more of a player than a coach, the left would fear him most of all.

MARK LEVIN

My assessment of Mark Levin unfortunately reveals a sever personal failing of my own. He bombards his audience with more information than any three hosts combined. That information is well researched, perfectly sequenced, and convincingly presented. Unquestionably, his arguments are well processed and ready for immediate human digestion, so never does he leave the listener feeling bloated. I respect beyond words his insistence that the Federalist Papers, the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence have lifetime memberships in his arguments. I just can't get past the voice. This is my problem not his.

GLEN BECK

I don't buy Glen Beck's assertion that he is slow on the uptake and just a regular guy, but I do find his approach to be the most potentially likely of success, or measurable positive impact. He seems to have discovered the perfect mixture of passion, sincerity, and theater. Another very appealing and rare characteristic Mr. Beck seems to possess, is that he doesn't appear to care how long it takes to bring Americas back from the brink. There is no way to overstate the importance of having people that can successfully combat growing weary amidst a battle of indeterminate duration. As a matter of fact, the only thing I could see getting in the way of Mr. Beck would be if he contracted elephantiasis of the ego from Bill O'Reilly.

BILL O'REILLY

Speaking of Mr. O'Reilly, I personally don't believe he even belongs on this list but since so many of his assailants do, I include him. I'm afraid the fact that he has never aired any of my emails, all of which being superior than any he has used, may prejudice my opinion. Just the same, I find his selection of topics and issues he chooses to champion to be well thought out, worthy of attention, and intelligently addressed. However, I do see his sincerity and displayed passion to be contrived, artificial, and as phony as a Virgin Mary sighting at the Mustang Ranch. He is far and away the most deserving of the title, 'entertainer'. Were an ego something actually capable of physically exploding, I would nightly expect blood and shredded ego tissue to be hurled violently at the screen. Whether Fox News would immediately go to commercial, or keep the cameras rolling, I do not know. If anyone doubts my assessment of his ego, ask yourself, is having intellectually bested the likes of Barney Frank really something to write home about, much less put on a bumper sticker? Realistically, emerging victorious from a battle of wits with Barney Frank is about as noteworthy as getting the better of Al Gore or Joe Biden on the history of the Internet or television, or knowing more about everything than Chris Dodd.

MICHELLE MALKIN

No one in the media is as capable of employing such a gentle, polite, palatable tone while presenting matter of fact, which is anything but gentle, polite, or palatable than Michelle Malkin. But this tact, which melds with her outward appearance, is but a ruse to lure her prey into range. Once coaxed into her sights, her petite physical stature belies the immense nuclear powered thrust by which she can propel her message. She is an air hammer loaded with facts rather than roofing nails. It is no coincidence that those willing to debate her number zero. Any liberal that crosses her path looks like the proverbial idiot that brings an emery board to a gunfight. While a handful of pseudo-advocates will still occasionally spew out intentionally ineffective dribblings against illegal immigration, Ms. Malkin is the only true warrior against America's ongoing genocide. So well armed are her positions, that she can't even discuss them on Fox News without Geraldo Rivera getting his big brother, Billy, to beat her up for him. However Big Brother Billy wanted none of her so he sunk to a level lower than a snake's belly in a wagon wheel rut, and underhandedly did everything he could to limit her airtime. Or so I've surmised. With liberal weaponry being loaded only with feelings(blanks), and the left being pledged irreversibly to harming this country, I have absolutely no sympathy for any of them that stray into the raking fire delivered by Ms. Malkin's arsenal loaded with lethal facts.

MRS. JAMES CARVILLE

Mrs. James Carville comes across as rational, pleasantly analytical, and persuasive, but always there looms the Satan-like shadow of her husband. Or is that, cadaver-like shadow? I just can't bring myself to trust someone who seems to have entered the holy state of matrimony for the sole purpose of guaranteeing that at least one would always be gainfully employed. Heck, even Bill and Hillarys' marital contract clearly displayed a unity of mind and purpose, and I refuse to abandon my contention that the most important element of a successful, meaningful, caring bond, is not a sense of humor, respect, trust, or even love, but an identical sense of right and wrong. And if they do share a like sense of right and wrong, that sense is unsavory and mercenary at best. I can't clear my mind of images of Mr. and Mrs. Carville lying down at night, gleefully disputing which one moved more spaces that day on the 'game board' of American politics.

DICK MORRIS

As a prognosticator, no one can hold a candle to Dick Morris. I end up agreeing with him on a more consistent basis than any other commentator, with the possible exception of Laura Ingram, and it bugs the crap out of me. Here is a man, regardless of any recent self-reformative efforts, looking at politics as much or more of a game than do the Carvilles, and probably would have come up with the idea for O.J. Simpson not to take his arthritis medicine, in preparation of trying on the gloves, before anyone else did, were he on the 'dream team'. It pains me that I agree with someone so much whom I do not trust, nor even like as a person. Because of this conundrum, Mr. Morris is the one person I discuss, that I would most like to meet face to face.

DENNIS MILLER

My appreciation for Dennis Miller is probably firmly rooted in self approval. Like myself, he is genetically wired to the one liner and never ending searches for the obscure metaphor to arrogantly test his audience. I realize that aspiring to Mr. Miller's skill level is sort of like Arnold Schwazenegger thinking he could turn himself into a flabby, unauthentic, political milksop. Ah, hope springs eternal. Someday I wish to be certain enough of my own gifts so as to be able to either challenge Mr. Miller's crown or concede to his unapproachable mastery, abandon my pursuit of his throne, and graciously relinquish the field unbloodied.


LAURA INGRAM

Only one thing prevents me from identifying Laura Ingram as my favorite. Her argument formulation and structure, as well as her, manner, delivery, mirror my own.(almost) However, I can't rid myself of the feeling that she has weakened and may secretly view the war already lost, and like an unmanned, computer driven weapon, she robotic ally fights on. This is, without a doubt, the one suspicion I would most like to be dead wrong about.

MICHEAL SAVAGE

Whether I enjoyed Michael Savage's program was solely dependent upon my mood at the time. He seemed to turn my otherwise logic-dedicated mind into a gob of goo, reacting almost entirely on an emotional level. I would always have to turn him off, and wait fifteen or twenty minutes for my analytical powers to escape from the Savage correctional and nostril hair grooming facility. Only then could I reliably assess anything he said. As you may have already gathered, I no longer listen to Mr. Savage. The last straw was when I heard him call Greta Van Susteren, "scar face". This evil, hateful, subhuman, completely un-Christian act, reveling in the misfortune of another, leads me to believe, if you'll pardon the obvious oxymoronic component of the advice, that Mr. Savage should spend his every waking moment praying there is no God. By the way, in case no one else noticed, Greta has gone from an entrenched liberal to quite the little pragmatist.

PAT BUCHANAN

Pat Buchanan was for many years my pick for 'Deep Throat'. But how can you totally condemn someone who diverted so many illiterate voters from Al Gore in the Florida 2000' presidential race. In his book, "Death of the West", he clearly sees the impending devolution of America to a third world country. His only mistake being: foretelling an unrealistically lengthy amount of time for this metastasis. Sadly, for whatever reason, perhaps past election rejections, I sense he has become one of those willing to sit back and watch the death of America, just so he can say, "I told you so".

NEWT GANGRICH

As for Newt Gangrich, no single individual I discuss here has caused me to see-saw so wildly and often as this man. At long last, Newt has managed to single-handedly prove to me that there is absolutely no direct correlation between intelligence and courage. Grievously, I was too dense when Henry Kissinger tried to teach me the same lesson years ago. No doubt Newt could kick my ass on any quiz show, but his line about going to Washington to change it, and it changed him is clever and revealing, is only half right. It exposes many things, none of which are wise or noble. The comment does confirm that he believes that anyone that goes to Washington, DC, no matter how honorable, will be perverted. If his contention is accurate, no one that has gone to Washington, DC, in the last thirty years or more should ever have been sent there in the first place, and the American people should reanimate Thomas Jefferson, and revolt. Newt's words clearly state that the corruption of our government is so all pervasive that is cannot be changed from within. Whether there is enough honorable people left in this country to re-staff Washington, DC, remains to be seen, but the fact remains that everyone currently in Washington, is nothing but a pestilence upon our Constitution. I wish Newt had the courage, integrity, and devotion to this country, to couple his intellect, with an awareness that doing right is more important than just being right.

SEAN HANNITY

Unquestionably, the last thing President Obama wants to do is go have a beer with Sean Hannity. I, however, like the guy, and would love to pounce on a shot or two of Scotch with him except for one thing, I'm not sure he has reached legal drinking age. Sean looks at everything through the eyes of a child. While this can often be a good thing, as Jesus claimed, but when trying to make a point with an elusive leftist, the I double-dog dare-ya routine just doesn't cut it. I think my biggest problem with Sean is that he can't get off Reagan. Despite Reagan being the only Presidential candidate I truly voted for, this country needs much more than a second coming of Ronald Reagan. Reagan was too easily talked out of good ideas by cowards poorly disguised as political pragmatists. What this country needs is someone just as firmly rooted or more so, in principle, and less susceptible to the voices advocating dilution of those principles for the sake of expediency and promoting methodologies that violate those principles. Since even the most optimistic doubt a second coming, I am not lost to the reality that what I think is needed for this country is even more of a pie in the sky.

CARL ROVE

Debating as to whether Mr. Rove is an analyst or a commentator is a bigger waste of time than arguing whether or not Underdog could beat up Mighty Mouse. The fact that Mr. Rove does allot of smiling when he speaks of the idiocies spewing forth from liberals does not invalidate his accuracy. And when he points out, as many others have, including myself, that the only transparency liberals and the Obama administration exhibit is revealing their own corruption,(plain at least to anyone with more than three functioning brain cells) the delight that shows in his face can be interpreted as honest and justified. Personally, I prefer someone with a slight poker face to someone like Walter Cronkite who for decades successfully passed himself off as an objective reporter, covertly injecting his ultra-left beliefs into his comments. I do wish Sean Hannity would stop feeding Mr. Rove ego growth hormones every time he introduces him, always calling Mr. Rove 'the architect' is getting nauseating.

At the epicenter of my motives for writing these brief blurbs lies a desire to inspire people to listen to these personalities and make up their own minds, especially since I perceive their own minds to be in jeopardy of becoming no longer their own. If independent thought was not in danger, how is it we just acquiesced to the government spending, in 2009 alone, the equivalent of spending over sixty cents a day, for every day the Universe itself is theorized to have existed? If only Republicans could see that if they simply held to the Constitution and the values therein, leftist would never be a concern of notoriety or consequence. Republicans risk extinction if they wander into the Labrea Tar Pits of political strategy founded in corrupt manipulation. Both Socialism and Communism are deeply mired and at home in this pit and Republicans must resist stumbling into this corrupt, unethical quagmire to avoid being fossilized. Apathy and ignorance can, and perhaps already has reached a fatal level in this country, but how scurrilous it would be if we let America go calmly into the night of human failures.

COAKLEY'S SPEEDY CONCESSION MUST HAVE RILED OBAMA AND HIS TROOP

Yesterday, I figured a 5% victory by Mr. Brown represented the minimum margin of victory he required to insure being certified as the winner. Of course, yesterday, I figured a 5% victory was virtually impossible. After all, we are talking about Massachusetts. However, even given my original supposition, I suspect Obama would have preferred a little more time to ponder the possible options which could impact returns in his favor. Given Obama's ferocity on the campaign trail, unconcerned with such trivialities as ethics and law, I'm sure he would have wished to have had time to leave no gravestone unturned. This pursuit was, however, largely derailed by Ms. Coakley's quick (at least for Democrats) concession.

Ms. Coakley's concession was so timely, if not possessing the customary graciousness typical of a Republican in the same situation, I immediately asked myself why? Could she be a decent and honorable person that simply misguidedly aligned herself completely with Obama's ultra-left agenda? No, came to mind as fast as if I were asked if I thought George Bush was a conservative. There is no way a fair minded person, governed by conscience could favor any legislation(Obamacare) that has such a well- documented history of lies, deception, secrecy, and bribery. So why did she do it? I've concluded that since Obama's crowd was throwing insults and criticism at her and her campaign, even before a single vote was cast, she felt Obama's lead- weighted coattails were largely responsible for her defeat and 'Team Obama's' attacks were cowardly and inappropriate. If these were her feelings, feelings I, in fact, share, she may have felt that a rapid concession would narrow Obama's options to contest the election and thus serve as a last laugh before she was sent to the 'cheap seats' next to Rev. Wright.

Regardless of 'Team Obama's' spin, this election was unquestionably a referendum on the President. Mr. Brown's positions could not have been more divergent from Obama's and Ms. Coakley's could not have been more tightly bound to Obama's agenda and methods. Democrats say that the election was merely an unfortunate result of an anti-incumbency movement overtaking the nation,(implying it is a bad thing!) but make no mistake, if Ms. Coakley had not been so heavily ballasted by the President, she would have won handily.

DON'T PANIC DONKEYS

Tuesday morning and Democrats are bracing for the most unbelievable, unexpected, cast iron, monkey wrench to be thrown into their excessively greased machine that was supposed to carry them all the way to their dream of complete COMMIALISM. To all the haters of capitalism, despisers of the Constitution, and those that view the Founding Fathers as despicable self-serving scum, do not despair. You must not panic or you will only make things worse for yourselves. If Mr. Brown wins in Massachusetts, and you follow your natural instincts and falsify the vote count, delay certification, or drag your feet to seat Mr. Brown, you will only reveal too much of your true selves to an electorate who is finally, at long last, looking for corruption and wanting to do something about it.

I realize I am asking the seemingly impossible of liberals and certainly something they have never exhibited before: Patience and a rudimentary grasp of history. Impatience not Republicans, has always been the self constructed obstacle to the far left agenda, and though I am certain that one can't be an honest student of history and a liberal, Democrats must dig deep and find the strength to at least trust in history. History has shown while Republicans may briefly agree to a return to their roots of fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, strong national defense, and a re-affirmation of the concept of right and wrong, it wont last for long. So, to all liberals, don't abandon ship even if Mr. Brown wins or even if there is a massive shift of power later this year, because your chance will come again and thanks to your phenomenally successful destruction of education, your elimination of a free press, and that too many Republican politicians have accepted ethical guidance from liberals, your next chance to turn the United States of America into something unrecognizable will come sooner than later.